His new book sounds pretty good, but I'm kinda let down. I wish that he went in a different direction. it's mostly because of him that people have taken an interest in secret societies lately and so I'd like to see him raise the bar, and not do a book about the masons and the templars like everyone else.
I want to read it, but I know I'm going to be disappointed. He's a great thriller writer, and it's cool that he's mixing in history, but his history is shit.
Davinci Code was a blatant rip-off of Holy Blood, Holy Grail and the only reason Brown got away from the lawsuit was because it's "history" and therefor public knowledge, even though it was someone else's research that brought it forth.
As for A& D, it makes no sense and is not even real history. Galileo the founder of the Illuminati? Read Nesta A. Websters (anti)Illuminati conspiracy history-
World Revolution. It has much better historical facts and a compelling argument that dwarfs brown's fictions. Are the masterminds for domination the Zionists or the Third Reich (that never ended)?