Fake News: CNN Accidentally Falsely Admits It Aired Pornography for 30 Minutes on Thanksgiving

CNN, which has come under enormous scrutiny for its lack of editorial standards over the course of the 2016 presidential election, fell for a series of so-called “fake news” reports that hammered its own network on Friday.
Late Thursday evening on Thanksgiving, a Twitter user in the Boston area reported that CNN was airing hardcore pornography for 30 minutes through local provider RCN. The original report on those Tweets surfaced in The Independent, a leading left-of-center newspaper based in the United Kingdom. From there, the story spread like wildfire to many other media outlets including Variety magazine, the U.K. Daily Mail, the New York Post, Esquire magazine and Mashable, among others.

Throughout all of this, the Breitbart News Network team was aggressively researching television video capturing services like TV Eyes and Critical Mention, among others, and scouring social media looking for evidence. We reached out to CNN, asking at least two different spokespersons for comment on the matter and even asking the producer for resident media critic Brian Stelter’s program Reliable Sources for comment.

Breitbart News sent CNN spokeswoman Emily Kuhn a link to the Independent’s original post, asking: “Any comment on why CNN was airing this in Boston? Will anyone be held accountable?”

Kuhn didn’t reply. So Breitbart News also reached out to Stelter’s producer Shanta Covington, asking: “Wanted to see if Brian has any comment on why CNN was airing a half an hour of nonstop hardcore pornography? Does he still think you guys are a news organization?”

Covington, and Stelter, didn’t reply.

But, since this network has higher editorial standards than anyone else and seeks actual evidence before publishing such a story, Breitbart News still sought more evidence before rushing out there with something. No evidence emerged, which made our entire editorial team skeptical—we wondered how, if this aired for 30 minutes in a huge media market like Boston, there was no video emerging online of it?

Eventually, CNN actually confirmed that it did air “inappropriate content” and was seeking an “explanation” from RCN.

“The RCN cable operator in Boston aired inappropriate content for 30 minutes on CNN last night. CNN has asked for an explanation,” CNN said in its statement, seemingly confirming the impropriety.

Even pornography websites like Brazzers mocked CNN for it, saying that airing such pornography would amount to the “least offensive” thing the network has done in the last year.

But Breitbart News still wasn’t satisfied it actually happened and reached out to Kuhn once more with a link to a story from The Verge containing CNN’s admission of impropriety, a piece that called the entire fiasco “fake news.” Fake news is the new phenomenon emerging in the wake of Donald Trump’s landslide victory whereby establishment outlets are targeting new media outlets that are booming in growth while establishment media crumbles. So Breitbart News sought additional confirmation from Kuhn before publishing anything, trying to ensure that the accurate story was told when we eventually reported the news.

“They’re saying it’s ‘fake news,’” Breitbart News emailed Kuhn. “But CNN is confirming that ‘inappropriate content’ aired in the statement quoted here. So did CNN air pornography or not? We want to get the details correct, given Breitbart’s high editorial standards. Please let me know.”

Kuhn still hasn’t answered. But now, according to the originally incorrect report from Variety, which was based on the inaccurate piece from the Independent, both CNN and RCN are denying the reports CNN admitted to — that they aired inappropriate content for 30 minutes on Thanksgiving in Boston.

It turns out, even when the news is about CNN and the rest of the media, Breitbart News is one of the only places you can trust to take the time and make the effort to get it right before rushing click bait online. The rest of the media is compromised, even CNN — and CNN is even compromised when it comes to information about CNN.

This all comes in the wake of several legacy media outlet reporters admitting on Breitbart News Daily’s Thanksgiving radio special on SiriusXM 125 Patriot Channel that their industry faces significant credibility problems. Stelter, CNN’s media reporter, was invited on the show as well, but Kuhn told Breitbart News he was unable to make the time to appear outside CNN to defend CNN.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...d-pornography-for-30-minutes-on-thanksgiving/
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
If it is on the Internet then it must be true.
 
So (per the article) it looks like it did not happen.
However IF it happened I'm willing to believe it might have due to something like this has happened a few times over the years. It wouldn't be CNN's fault if a local cable techie switched the wrong content onto the CNN channel. Of all the cases I have heard about dating back to the early 70s, it turned out to be the graveyard shift technician (least experienced guy) watching porn in the control room and hitting the wrong switch. It can happen even when pot/booze aren't involved but they usually are. ;) Blaming CNN would be like blaming Ford or GM if you buy a new car and your kid finds a baggie with a couple of joints in the backseat that the detail guy dropped. The dealership might be culpable, but not the manufacturer.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
I hate fake news. Especially fake news like "This will be the most transparent administration in history." Or "If you like your plan you can keep your plan," Or "Obama enjoys a fifty-four percent approval rating." I'm pretty sure the people doing that polling also called the election for Hilldebeast. Another good one was "This is the most scandal-free presidency in history." Both sides know they're massive whoppers but only one side actually cared. And it showed on Nov 8th. I just thought of another one,"There has been no significant illegal immigration for the last six years." That one cracks me up.

Oooh. Oooh. One more. "Global warming is the greatest threat to our nation." Holy fuck. How could anyone say that without being struck by lightning?
 
Last edited:
But you're OK with fake news such as "We're gonna build a wall", "We have to repal it [Obamacare] and replace it", "I am going to instruc my AG to get a special prosecutor to look into your [Hillary's] situation" or "We're going to cancel the Paris climate agreement".

So bottomline, it's not about the lies, it's about who says them. When Obama is lying, it's outrageous. When Trump is lying, it's OK.

:facepalm:
 

Yeah don't be posting snopes links anymore.
Despite the fact they get it right about 90 to 95% of the time and always provide researchable documentation, Trump is going to be president now, which means we should all just learn to uncritically accept whatever horseshit the RW propaganda machine, or for that matter the president himself, routinely cranks out.

No more facts causing frequent embarrassment like the last 8 years. That was ever so untidy.

For instance, if our messiah says he saw thousands of New Jersey muslims celebrating the fall of the twin towers, that's all we need to know.

To question is to be unpatriotic; even treasonous.
Kinda like the ways things are in Russia :)
 
"S&!^ posts" comments are as the pic suggests

spam cans.jpg

mine was a view of the thread subject

HAVE A NICE DAY- NO OFFENCE TAKEN
 
Top