Drones Are Watching You

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
It's not 2012....it's 1984.

Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress

By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

Look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? Is it a plane? It’s … a drone, and it’s watching you. That’s what privacy advocates fear from a bill Congress passed this week to make it easier for the government to fly unmanned spy planes in U.S. airspace.

The FAA Reauthorization Act, which President Obama is expected to sign, also orders the Federal Aviation Administration to develop regulations for the testing and licensing of commercial drones by 2015.

Privacy advocates say the measure will lead to widespread use of drones for electronic surveillance by police agencies across the country and eventually by private companies as well.

“There are serious policy questions on the horizon about privacy and surveillance, by both government agencies and commercial entities,” said Steven Aftergood, who heads the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation also is “concerned about the implications for surveillance by government agencies,” said attorney Jennifer Lynch.

The provision in the legislation is the fruit of “a huge push by lawmakers and the defense sector to expand the use of drones” in American airspace, she added.

According to some estimates, the commercial drone market in the United States could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars once the FAA clears their use.

The agency projects that 30,000 drones could be in the nation’s skies by 2020.

The highest-profile use of drones by the United States has been in the CIA’s armed Predator-drone program, which targets al Qaeda terrorist leaders. But the vast majority of U.S. drone missions, even in war zones, are flown for surveillance. Some drones are as small as model aircraft, while others have the wingspan of a full-size jet.

In Afghanistan, the U.S. use of drone surveillance has grown so rapidly that it has created a glut of video material to be analyzed.

The legislation would order the FAA, before the end of the year, to expedite the process through which it authorizes the use of drones by federal, state and local police and other agencies. The FAA currently issues certificates, which can cover multiple flights by more than one aircraft in a particular area, on a case-by-case basis.

The Department of Homeland Security is the only federal agency to discuss openly its use of drones in domestic airspace.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an agency within the department, operates nine drones, variants of the CIA’s feared Predator. The aircraft, which are flown remotely by a team of 80 fully qualified pilots, are used principally for border and counternarcotics surveillance under four long-term FAA certificates.

Officials say they can be used on a short-term basis for a variety of other public-safety and emergency-management missions if a separate certificate is issued for that mission.

“It’s not all about surveillance,” Mr. Aftergood said.

Homeland Security has deployed drones to support disaster relief operations. Unmanned aircraft also could be useful for fighting fires or finding missing climbers or hikers, he added.

The FAA has issued hundreds of certificates to police and other government agencies, and a handful to research institutions to allow them to fly drones of various kinds over the United States for particular missions.

The agency said it issued 313 certificates in 2011 and 295 of them were still active at the end of the year, but the FAA refuses to disclose which agencies have the certificates and what their purposes are.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is suing the FAA to obtain records of the certifications.

“We need a list so we can ask [each agency], ‘What are your policies on drone use? How do you protect privacy? How do you ensure compliance with the Fourth Amendment?’ ” Ms. Lynch said.

“Currently, the only barrier to the routine use of drones for persistent surveillance are the procedural requirements imposed by the FAA for the issuance of certificates,” said Amie Stepanovich, national security counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a research center in Washington.

The Department of Transportation, the parent agency of the FAA, has announced plans to streamline the certification process for government drone flights this year, she said.

“We are looking at our options” to oppose that, she added.

Section 332 of the new FAA legislation also orders the agency to develop a system for licensing commercial drone flights as part of the nation’s air traffic control system by 2015.

The agency must establish six flight ranges across the country where drones can be test-flown to determine whether they are safe for travel in congested skies.

Representatives of the fast-growing unmanned aircraft systems industry say they worked hard to get the provisions into law.

“It sets deadlines for the integration of [the drones] into the national airspace,” said Gretchen West, executive vice president of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, an industry group.

She said drone technology is new to the FAA.

The legislation, which provides several deadlines for the FAA to report progress to Congress, “will move the [drones] issue up their list of priorities,” Ms. West said.

Get the motherfuckin' government out of my private life!!!! :eek: We're moving toward a police state folks! :eek:
 

Kingfisher

Here Zombie, Zombie, Zombie...
Wow that actually got through. I was hoping it wouldn't. Oh well.
I heard Florida basically paved the way for these to get passed, the Police Department wanted to use MAV's to "look for criminals" or "monitor drug traffic", so they had to petition the FAA for clearance in the air, so they wouldn't intercede current air traffic, so one thing led to another. Soon Predator Drones with Hellfires popping gang bangers...
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself.

He loved Big Brother.
 
All these people that voted for Obama because their civil liberties were being trampled upon. :1orglaugh
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
Who's gonna pay for them? Oh wait, we are...just like all the rest of the shit our government does that no one fuckin wants!
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
I was going to write something about the USBP using drones for several years but the article covered that. Damn your efficient use of space, Jagger!
 
This just reinforces the argument for American citizens keeping up a well regulated militia complete with modern anti-aircraft weaponry. The 2nd ammendment was meant not only for small arms, but for all up to date military equipment. All of the weapons must be in the hands of the people in order to keep tyranny at bay. When the tyrants have all the weapons the people are slaves, as they currently are.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
All these people that voted for Obama because their civil liberties were being trampled upon. :1orglaugh

Wrong BC. Congress passed the bill and the last time I looked the republicans were in control over there. Still, Obama could have vetoed it and didn't. Nice to see these guys reaching across the aisle to get something positive done for once! :rolleyes: :mad:
 

Red XXX

Official Checked Star Member
Come to the UK, cameras on every street corner, tracking of all mobile phones, and instant £1000 fines for anything, electronic tagging of criminals instead of prison etc, etc - this poor old sceptred isle.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
This just reinforces the argument for American citizens keeping up a well regulated militia complete with modern anti-aircraft weaponry. The 2nd ammendment was meant not only for small arms, but for all up to date military equipment. All of the weapons must be in the hands of the people in order to keep tyranny at bay. When the tyrants have all the weapons the people are slaves, as they currently are.

"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government."

Declaration of Independence
 
Wrong BC. Congress passed the bill and the last time I looked the republicans were in control over there. Still, Obama could have vetoed it and didn't. Nice to see these guys reaching across the aisle to get something positive done for once! :rolleyes: :mad:

Which is exactly why they voted for him. They believed he would stop things such as this. He tipped his hand a few years ago when he voted to re-authorize the Patriot Act.
 

vodkazvictim

Why save the world, when you can rule it?
The very least efficient way to surveil a nation. Lighter than air aircraft can stay on station longer, cheaper and more reliably.
Either this is bad because it's channeling money to the manufacturers of these innefficient drones or it;'s good because there will be so very many holes in the surveilance net.
 
Top