Faith Nelson / Faith / Louise / Sexy Faith

yeh cant really excuse it, whats be done is soooooo wrong.

she doesnt run the website though does she? inbedwithfaith was always run by SterlingCash or someone like that i thought.
 
So, this raises a few questions/thoughts though.

1. Is inbedwithfaith.com the site she is earning money from to this day?
2. If so, why hasn't there been any new photos for years, if she still supports it?
3. Was faithexposed.com something she willingly released or was it done by an ex boyfriend?
4. She has obviously gained some weight over the last years
5. A few years back, she tried to model as "Denise Bell" (her full name is Lisa Denise Bell), and she was really thin (too thin if you ask me)

We nee a timeline of events here, people! :)
 
1. Is inbedwithfaith.com the site she is earning money from to this day?

Presumably she is still making money on the site, though it hasn't advertised or attempted to solicit business as far as I can tell.

2. If so, why hasn't there been any new photos for years, if she still supports it?

Saying she supports it assumes that she's still involved with the site directly. She probably has the server still running, but doesn't do squat about updating it. It's easy to not update the site you have to work on when you're making money without working.

3. Was faithexposed.com something she willingly released or was it done by an ex boyfriend?

Supposedly it was done by an ex boyfriend. There may or may not have been a lawsuit about it - I think the news feeds got confused about what really happened, and it's possible that anything that happened happened out of court.

4. She has obviously gained some weight over the last years

Okay... no question here, so hard to comment on it.

5. A few years back, she tried to model as "Denise Bell" (her full name is Lisa Denise Bell), and she was really thin (too thin if you ask me)

Again no question here, so hard to comment. I remember her trying to get into legitimate modelling under Denise Bell as well. IIRC, she started out as doing lingerie.

We nee a timeline of events here, people!

As nice as it would be to have a precise timeline of events, I don't think it's really that important. She had the inbedwithfaith site for a long time before these allegations (and the events alleged within) were made. Based on previous posts, it's pretty clear that the faithexposed website was not her idea, and according to her the work she did with Reality Kings wasn't really to her liking either. Apparently the photographer was a little too handsy for her tastes. Based on the information presented in the allegations against her, she wasn't doing the scam for long enough that it imposed on her website. I would suppose that the site wasn't generating enough money for her, compared to the amount of work she had to do. Add to that the dealings with people like Reality Kings, and it makes sense she'd look for money elsewhere. From what I've read in the papers, it sounds like this scam was mostly her mom's idea, but of course she got sucked into it. Presumably she's interested in making as much money as possible while doing as little work as possible. Which is a bad combination that leads to bad things.
 
As nice as it would be to have a precise timeline of events, I don't think it's really that important. She had the inbedwithfaith site for a long time before these allegations (and the events alleged within) were made. Based on previous posts, it's pretty clear that the faithexposed website was not her idea, and according to her the work she did with Reality Kings wasn't really to her liking either. Apparently the photographer was a little too handsy for her tastes. Based on the information presented in the allegations against her, she wasn't doing the scam for long enough that it imposed on her website. I would suppose that the site wasn't generating enough money for her, compared to the amount of work she had to do. Add to that the dealings with people like Reality Kings, and it makes sense she'd look for money elsewhere. From what I've read in the papers, it sounds like this scam was mostly her mom's idea, but of course she got sucked into it. Presumably she's interested in making as much money as possible while doing as little work as possible. Which is a bad combination that leads to bad things.

I remember such comments about XX-Cel, but perhaps XX-Cel and RealityKings are the same thing? There was that video where he grabbed and sucked her tits and I remember her saying that she didn't like it in some other context. In fact, it may have been in this thread, but I'm unsure whether I believe that that was really her posting here, because if it was, then she was promoting faithexposed.com herself, which doesn't rhyme with other comments I've read from her.

The timeline I had in mind was when or if she lost control and/or interest in inbedwithfaith.com, also what the story was with faithexposed.com. Plus, what she's been up to - apart form the Denise Bell thing - since she stopped updating inbedwithfaith.com.

As far as this lawsuit goes, I'm not judging anyone either way. For the sound of it, it seems as if this was her mother's scam and she just helped out knowingly or unknowingly. Seeing how money were bounced to Lisa and then back to Wendy suggests that it have been knowingly. I just got curious since Lisa told the press/court that she was currently running a "private porn site" (which may not have been a verbatim quote of course) and I just wondered which site that may have been, seeing how she doesn't seem to have been involved in inbedwithfaith.com for a really long time.
 
I remember such comments about XX-Cel, but perhaps XX-Cel and RealityKings are the same thing? There was that video where he grabbed and sucked her tits and I remember her saying that she didn't like it in some other context. In fact, it may have been in this thread, but I'm unsure whether I believe that that was really her posting here, because if it was, then she was promoting faithexposed.com herself, which doesn't rhyme with other comments I've read from her.

I think XX-Cel was her ex-boyfriend maybe? I can't remember all the specifics. But yeah, she seemed to not be happy with either of them. Whether or not she was telling the truth though... hard to say. Someone that can do the things she's accused of doing probably shouldn't be trusted. She may have been using that to get publicity. And it's possible that she may have been lying about her affiliation with faithexposed, and she was really involved with the site. I'd like to think that she really didn't like what was going on, and realized that she was getting the wrong kind of publicity. This is the motivation that I believe drove her to stop updating inbedwithfaith and start trying to be a lingerie model under her real name. And the fact that she didn't make it as a lingerie model may have driven her to get involved with the scam. To me, the motivations are all there and they make sense. But yeah without a timeline of things that happened behind the scenes, it's impossible to know for sure. I mean, when did she start getting involved with this scam, and how did that correlate with the sites, the lingerie modelling, etc.? I'm afraid we won't really ever know. From what I understand, the attorneys in England can ask almost anything they want when someone is on the stand, so perhaps the prosecution will find out for us? :p

The timeline I had in mind was when or if she lost control and/or interest in inbedwithfaith.com, also what the story was with faithexposed.com. Plus, what she's been up to - apart form the Denise Bell thing - since she stopped updating inbedwithfaith.com.

That's a good question. I'd like to know, if only because I think this story is very interesting. It's definitely got a Law & Order vibe to it. And of course there's the question of if she was manipulated by her mother, or went into this with open eyes. I'm hoping that we get a lot of info out of the trial. It's definitely an interesting situation.

As far as this lawsuit goes, I'm not judging anyone either way. For the sound of it, it seems as if this was her mother's scam and she just helped out knowingly or unknowingly. Seeing how money were bounced to Lisa and then back to Wendy suggests that it have been knowingly. I just got curious since Lisa told the press/court that she was currently running a "private porn site" (which may not have been a verbatim quote of course) and I just wondered which site that may have been, seeing how she doesn't seem to have been involved in inbedwithfaith.com for a really long time.

I didn't catch the part where she had told the press or courts that she was running a private porn site. I thought that the press had dug that up on their own? If she admitted some affiliation was still ongoing, that certainly raises a few other questions.
 
I think XX-Cel was her ex-boyfriend maybe?

Nah, don't think so. He was the guy that sucked on her tits when he was alone with her in the room with only a video camera, and she said (here) that she disliked it a lot.

I didn't catch the part where she had told the press or courts that she was running a private porn site. I thought that the press had dug that up on their own? If she admitted some affiliation was still ongoing, that certainly raises a few other questions.

Here is a quote:
She told police that she supplemented her income as a carer by running a private porn website.

But then there's this:
Lisa Bell told the police she had a full time sales role in her father's company and had worked as a model, earning roughly £2,000 a month, until she was 25.

And a bit of support for the idea that she scammed unknowingly:
Lisa Bell said her mother explained the money was because Mrs Hammond was unable to leave her money in her will.

And some more quotes here

When questioned by police about how she funded a lifestyle above that of an average carer, Bell explained she made a lot of money from her online career.

She boasts: "I'm a feisty British girl who just happens to have a gorgeous big pair of 32G boobs that I love to share with the world."

"I started this site when I was only just 18 and I've been making sexy big boob pictures and videos ever since."

So yeah, there are some different takes on this :)
 

John_8581

FreeOnes Lifetime Member
yeh cant really excuse it, whats be done is soooooo wrong.

she doesnt run the website though does she? inbedwithfaith was always run by SterlingCash or someone like that i thought.

The inbedwithfaith site was taken down this morning. Epoch (here in the US) has cancelled membership subscriptions. You just cannot connect to the website. It's done.

Yes, SterlingCash runs the website.

With this page, http://www.crocobabes.com/in-bed-with-faith/

Any sample picture gallery linking to crocobabes.com will work. Anything linking to sterlingcash will not.
 
ah interesting. I havnt been a member for years. I stopped when it was obvious that no new content was popping up, and she stopped going on cam.
Cel certainly wasn't her BF, hes just the guy that runs the xxcel website and does the same thing to all the girls. Her BF's name was Prince, or that's what she called him years and years ago.
 

Cam50

Banned
ah interesting. I havnt been a member for years. I stopped when it was obvious that no new content was popping up, and she stopped going on cam.
Cel certainly wasn't her BF, hes just the guy that runs the xxcel website and does the same thing to all the girls. Her BF's name was Prince, or that's what she called him years and years ago.

Not with the guy anymore. And she is not in jail!!!
 
Nope.. how do you know?

Because of this:

Wendy and Lisa Bell, who were both charged with conspiracy to defraud, showed no emotion as the foreman announced the guilty verdicts.

Helen Banks, 42, of Riddlesden, West Yorkshire, was cleared at Bradford Crown Court of conspiracy to defraud Mrs Hammond.

Judge Colin Burn told Wendy Bell, who was also found guilty of one charge of fraud, that a jail sentence was 'absolutely unavoidable'.

He said: 'You have both been convicted by the jury at the end of this lengthy trail of these serious matters. 'Particularly in your case Wendy Bell, by virtue of the amounts involved, a custodial sentence is absolutely unavoidable.' Carroll, 44, of Shipley, West Yorkshire, pleaded guilty to two charges of fraud and one charge of conspiracy to defraud at an earlier hearing.

Linda Mynott, 60, Caron Gilbert, 33, and Alice Barker, 59, all from Keighley, West Yorkshire, all admitted conspiracy to defraud. All the defendants will be sentenced at Bradford Crown Court on February 13.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-500-000-life-savings-overcharging-care.html
 

JCBoobs

Banned
Did You Miss her? Faith-nelson-2015.jpg
 
Top