Brazzers deleted scenes

[iwouldliketoknow]

Hello guys, I was searching for a Brazzer's scene with Rachel Starr and I couldn't find.
I just saw a post in some forum under the name "Brazzer's deleted scenes".
I'm curious about it, why Brazzers would delete some of their material?
Thanks in advance

 

[John_8581]

Hello guys, I was searching for a Brazzer's scene with Rachel Starr and I couldn't find.
I just saw a post in some forum under the name "Brazzer's deleted scenes".
I'm curious about it, why Brazzers would delete some of their material?
Thanks in advance

The main thing is that the videos don't work. Mindgeek does not upgrade or remaster scenes. So it's just easier for their webmaster to just remove them from the Brazzers website. Videos being taken down are not just at the Brazzers website. They're at Digital Playground, Mofos, Twistys, the Reality Kings Network, Property Sex, Reality Junkies, and Eritos. Any of the sites that Mindgeek owns.

Picture galleries, on the other hand, are removed because there is a liability issue. Having photo galleries up mean that they owe royalty fees to the photographer who owns the pictures. Removing the galleries means that Mindgeek does not have to continue to pay royalties out to the photographer.

 

[iwouldliketoknow]

The main thing is that the videos don't work. Mindgeek does not upgrade or remaster scenes. So it's just easier for their webmaster to just remove them from the Brazzers website. Videos being taken down is not just at the Brazzers website. It's at Digital Playground, Mofos, Twistys, the Reality Kings Network, Property Sex, Reality Junkies, and Eritos. Any of the sites that Mingeek owns.

Picture galleries, on the other hand, are removed because there is a liability issue. Having photo galleries up mean that they owe royalty fees to the photographer who owns the pictures. Removing the galleries means that Mindgeek does not have to continue to pay royalties out to the photographer.

Thanks for the explanation! You're a porn phD!

 

[batmaxo]

This site and IAFD likely have deleted scenes.
https://www.data18.com/name/rachel-starr/studios-brazzers

 

[John_8581]

I agree @batmaxo with your research. But you need to compare what data18.com and the iafd have listed verses what Brazzers actually has there as scenes ...

This site and IAFD likely have deleted scenes.
https://www.data18.com/name/rachel-starr/studios-brazzers

data18.com and the iafd have them shown. Although, you are talking about the Brazzers website. Mindgeek has had their webmaster take down scenes and in a dramatic fashion. But they haven't decimated the Brazzers website like they did with Twistys and Digital Playground for example. Also does the Brazzers website have scenes with all three things? My meaning, (1) the trailer, (2) the scene (3) the photo galleries. Probably not.

For example, male pornstars:

In 2012, James Deen had 479 scenes there; (most were Pornstar Punishment - they were either removed or edited and renamed.); data18.com now lists 197 scenes shown there.
In 2012. Nacho Vidal had 113 scenes there; (most were Pornstar Punishment - they were either removed or edited and renamed); data18.com now lists 11 scenes shown there.
In 2013, Bruce Venture had 23 scenes there; (most were Pornstar Punishment - they were either removed or edited and renamed.); data18.com now lists 20 scenes shown there.

For example, female pornstars:

In 2012, Rachel Starr had 53 scenes there; data18.com says there should be 49 scenes there now.
In 2010, Shyla Stylez had 68 scenes there, data18.com says there should be 58 scenes there now.
In 2011, Holly Halston had 47 scenes there; data18.com says there should be 41 scenes there now.
In 2009, Sienna West had 52 scenes there; data18.com says there should be 46 scenes there now.
In 2010, Carmella Bing had 45 scenes there; data18.com says there should be 32 scenes there now.
In 2011, Savannah Gold had 19 scenes there; data18.com says there should be 12 scenes there now.

Of these actors and actresses, how many of their scenes are fully complete? With photos, scenes, and the trailer? On average they could be as low as 45 percent to 55 percent complete. And with Twistys, the numbers are even worse.

 

[Steve-FreeOnes]

They're out there. You just need to know where to look. The internet doesn't forget, especially porn.

 

[John_8581]

I understand that Steve. For example, in the past, when the Brazzers site encountered server errors especially the http 500, 501, 502, 503 and http 504 errors (too many people were on the website); they used to bring over full scenes to Pornhub Premium; partial scenes to Pornhub (the free tube site) - however, since the G-D-P incident, that process has pretty much has ceased.

Who nowadays, uses Pornhub? (both free and premium)? With all pictures being taken down by the thousands, and videos taken down by the hundreds of thousands, it's like a deserted Western town with tumbleweeds floating by ...

The websites own the videos, as they pay a (one-time) salary to the videographers. But they don't own the photographs. They have to continually pay royalties out to the photographers as long as the picture galleries are up.

One last thing, recently, Brazzers has gone to screen caps instead of actual photographs. And some scenes I fear were shot with a cell phone. Bad positioning, terrible angles, heads cut off, bodies are out of focus on other screen caps. In other words, more "OnlyFans" like. Ugh. Truly not the best.

 

[The Identifier]

Yes, there are many Brazzers scenes that have been removed over the years. Many of which I still haven't been able to find via those unmentionable sources that Steve alludes to.

Because they must be like the no.1 producer of porn historically, I am forever finding Brazzers watermarked images on my computer that I have saved long ago. A subscription is always my first port of call to try and obtain anything of interest but it isn't always possible to find them because many have long since been removed.

One last thing, recently, Brazzers has gone to screen caps instead of actual photographs.

Yep, don't like this. It is not just true of Brazzers but other sites too; albeit I think they are MindGeek ones too. A worrying trend for someone who likes photo sets.

Brazzers have actually gone from one extreme to the other when it comes to image galleries because they have produced some of the largest sets I've seen (some in excess of 1000 photos) and yet now they aren't doing any! Just shooting the video and putting screencaps as the 'gallery'. Do they think nobody will notice?

Even though I like image sets probably more than most people, some of their older stuff was a bit excessive it has to be said because 300 is probably more than enough for any one scene. I'd definitely endorse more than 0 though!

Is it me or have they also started downsizing some of the older photo galleries? (if not removed entirely) I'm sure I've seen some of the BIG galleries that I mention be whittled down to more conservative numbers... meaning that if I did come across an old scene I liked the look of from x years ago, and did find it to still be among their catalog - I may be seeing the heavily-downsized version rather than the original version which contained more pics.

 

[batmaxo]

This site has full albums for many scenes
https://***********/albums/
If a scene for Rachel Star is needed do we have one image? IAFD will have anything deleted but we have to have something to look for.

 

[iwouldliketoknow]

Yes, there are many Brazzers scenes that have been removed over the years. Many of which I still haven't been able to find via those unmentionable sources that Steve alludes to.

Because they must be like the no.1 producer of porn historically, I am forever finding Brazzers watermarked images on my computer that I have saved long ago. A subscription is always my first port of call to try and obtain anything of interest but it isn't always possible to find them because many have long since been removed.

Yep, don't like this. It is not just true of Brazzers but other sites too; albeit I think they are MindGeek ones too. A worrying trend for someone who likes photo sets.

Brazzers have actually gone from one extreme to the other when it comes to image galleries because they have produced some of the largest sets I've seen (some in excess of 1000 photos) and yet now they aren't doing any! Just shooting the video and putting screencaps as the 'gallery'. Do they think nobody will notice?

Even though I like image sets probably more than most people, some of their older stuff was a bit excessive it has to be said because 300 is probably more than enough for any one scene. I'd definitely endorse more than 0 though!

Is it me or have they also started downsizing some of the older photo galleries? (if not removed entirely) I'm sure I've seen some of the BIG galleries that I mention be whittled down to more conservative numbers... meaning that if I did come across an old scene I liked the look of from x years ago, and did find it to still be among their catalog - I may be seeing the heavily-downsized version rather than the original version which contained more pics.

You are absolutely right!!!