You're funny. No. A lot of girls have what's called VIP. You can join for a one-time fee of $100.00 -- it entitles you to see sample videos (a few seconds worth. Some vids could be between thirty seconds to forty-five seconds) or maybe one or two pictures in a photo gallery. Nothing, content-wise is free. Even with the the purchase of the VIP offering, you still have to purchase the content.
Onlyfans has many problems, but the one I find the worse is the paywalling of material after you already pay for a subscription. What a stupid concept. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the performers are just trying to maximize what they get because some people are stupid enough to pay for a content and payment structure like that, and I don't necessarily fault them for potentially maximizing what they get....but on a personal level it pisses me off.
I would be much more willing to just pay more for a subscription, maybe even significantly more, upfront and get everything they produce (or almost everything if once in a very super great while they have an additional payed content) and know what I'm getting than the dumb ass thing of making people pay for every little bit of actual worthwhile content.
That by itself is a deal breaker that will keep me from going on the site and subscribing to performers I might otherwise do. I often wonder if a lot of performers even come out ahead in the end with all the people they turn off with that like me as opposed to the fewer people that will pay the extra. I don't know maybe the whales really are enough to more than make up the difference, but all things being equal I would think it's better to make more of one's fans happy, and get your material out so as many eyes can see it as possible while still making the same money.
The next biggest problem is not being able to actually see what your getting before you pay to subscribe to a performer. I don't like making purchases blind.
