• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

[NEEDS ID] Andi Anderson and Andie Anderson is the same person?

Last edited:

Luxman

#TRE45ON
doppelganger
 

John_8581

FreeOnes Lifetime Member
What two people: pornstars/adult models have had tattoos removed? Charles Dera and Melissa Riso.


To me? Facially ... they don't look alike at all. Bodywise? Andi with the "E" has bigger tits. Did she undergo another breast augmentation? That's at least two possibly a third?

They appear to be two different ladies.

But the only way you'll truly know ... the Andi with the "E" (as noted above) should have the same broken heart tattoo on her right buttock cheek.

====

From the March 2024 scene with Jimmy Michaels:

large_287.jpg


She doesn't. We have two different ladies here.

Mystery solved.
 
Last edited:

The Identifier

Administrator
Staff member
Platinum Member
There seems to be a general acceptance that they are the same babe among many prominent sites and yet I don't understand why. I'd expect the comments section on indexxx to be debating this night and day, for example. She just can't be that popular or people aren't paying enough attention. Even supposing they are in actual fact the same person, I'd still expect people to be questioning it.

Without some proof, I struggle to believe that they are the same person. It's like... what are they seeing that we're not?

It must just be a case of them assuming they are the same because they have the same name.

She doesn't show up using facial recognition tools either, so unless she's had a complete makeover beyond recognition then I don't get it.

And it's not like they're playing April Fools jokes either because this has been like it for some time.

Her DOB sounds about right if we were to go under the assumption it was the same person but other than that, I'm struggling.

All these sites suggest they are the same when surely they aren't:

https://www.indexxx.com/m/andi-anderson
https://www.thenude.com/Andi Anderson_50659.htm
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andianderson/gender=f/andi-anderson.htm
http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Andi_Anderson

theNude doesn't actually state it is her in terms of links but it has a pic of her as her profile image.
 
Just when I agreed with @The Identifier @John_8581 I found these:

https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/152695/andi-anderson-private-clips

https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/152695/23310357/my-comeback-scene


Andie Anderson says that after 8 years she is back:

"After eight years I am back!!!! Back doing what I love for fans and my own gratification."



In that account her name appears written as "Andi" but the model that appears is "Andie" the model without the broken heart tattoo.


So everything says that we got to a bad conclusion. What happens is that she seems to look very different; especially her face and for some reason she successfully removed her broken heart tattoo. If I hadn't seen this I would continue saying that they are different persons.

What is your opinion? 😮
 
but the model that appears is "Andie" the model without the broken heart tattoo.
That is not correct. It is Andi, the (originally) peroxide blonde with the injected lips and the broken heart tattoo. It hasn't been removed, in fact, it has been added to which you can clearly see in this clip - https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/1...on-in-officers-convention-3-part-four-of-four

I'll say what the others have said - they don't look the same to me and it's unclear why so many ppl seem to think that they are one and the same. Their faces are quite different: 1. eye brow shape; 2. eye shape; 3. noses - Andie's is wider, Andi's has a more prominent columella (fleshy bit betw nostrils);
4. Andie has natural plump-in-the-middle Cupid's Bow lips while Andi's have been injected and she also has a small mole on the edge of her right upper lip;
5. Jawlines - Andie's is more square; 6. Neck transition to collar bones - Andie's is longer, wider at the base and the clavicle is more prominent.

There's more but if that doesn't convince you I'm running an investment scheme you might be interested in...
 
That is not correct. It is Andi, the (originally) peroxide blonde with the injected lips and the broken heart tattoo. It hasn't been removed, in fact, it has been added to which you can clearly see in this clip - https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/1...on-in-officers-convention-3-part-four-of-four

I'll say what the others have said - they don't look the same to me and it's unclear why so many ppl seem to think that they are one and the same. Their faces are quite different: 1. eye brow shape; 2. eye shape; 3. noses - Andie's is wider, Andi's has a more prominent columella (fleshy bit betw nostrils);
4. Andie has natural plump-in-the-middle Cupid's Bow lips while Andi's have been injected and she also has a small mole on the edge of her right upper lip;
5. Jawlines - Andie's is more square; 6. Neck transition to collar bones - Andie's is longer, wider at the base and the clavicle is more prominent.

There's more but if that doesn't convince you I'm running an investment scheme you might be interested in...

This is a mess.

So the one in the videos on clips4sale is the real Andi. But IAFD has also added Andie's scenes in the same profile. And to make it more confusing, the two began creating content almost at the same time as MILIFs. And by the way; even in the clips Andi is unrecognizable too 🙄

For me it is already clear; I just sent a tweet asking Andie and tagging the IAFD account so that herself say that it is not Andi and AIFD sees that.

They are two different models. I think that if a model is going to enter the industry; she should do some research to see if someone else already uses a name [I know dumb agents are the ones who normally create names for a model].
 
They are different persons. The new Andie Anderson (probably 40+ yo) has no tatt, a different nose different eyebrows and different moles. One of them fairly prominent right to the pussy. The earlier Andi Anderson (37 yo) doesn't have this mole.
The profile on IAFD is split now.
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andieanderson/gender=f/andie-anderson.htm
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andianderson/gender=f/andi_anderson.htm

I'm sure the name Andie Anderson was deliberately chosen by the new performer/agent to participate on the fame of the earlier, retired Andi Anderson. I don't Andi was working recently, aside of the clips4sal scenes, which were released in 2020, so four years ago.

The new Andie started in 2022 and is still working.
 
There seems to be a general acceptance that they are the same babe among many prominent sites and yet I don't understand why. I'd expect the comments section on indexxx to be debating this night and day, for example. She just can't be that popular or people aren't paying enough attention. Even supposing they are in actual fact the same person, I'd still expect people to be questioning it.

All these sites suggest they are the same when surely they aren't:

https://www.indexxx.com/m/andi-anderson
https://www.thenude.com/Andi Anderson_50659.htm
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andianderson/gender=f/andi-anderson.htm
http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Andi_Anderson

theNude doesn't actually state it is her in terms of links but it has a pic of her as her profile image.
It's as always. One site cites the other. If it slips through the radar of the editors it will be mixed up.
The only way to resolve this, is to report it, which is easy on IAFD and Indexxx.

Unfortunately the vendors mix them up also (data 18, adultdvdempire, freeones etc.).
Pornbox is better, they have two different profiles:
https://pornbox.com/application/model/193037
https://pornbox.com/application/model/12292

rk made a mess out of it. They took the old profile of Andi (with her biographical data), took down the original Andi scenes and added the new Andie scenes...
https://www.realitykings.com/model/3595/andie-anderson
 
They are different persons. The new Andie Anderson (probably 40+ yo) has no tatt, a different nose different eyebrows and different moles. One of them fairly prominent right to the pussy. The earlier Andi Anderson (37 yo) doesn't have this mole.
The profile on IAFD is split now.
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andieanderson/gender=f/andie-anderson.htm
https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andianderson/gender=f/andi_anderson.htm

I'm sure the name Andie Anderson was deliberately chosen by the new performer/agent to participate on the fame of the earlier, retired Andi Anderson. I don't Andi was working recently, aside of the clips4sal scenes, which were released in 2020, so four years ago.

The new Andie started in 2022 and is still working.

I was writing the correction for IAFD when I saw that it was already done. I imagine it was you @deezer6 because I don't think they saw my Tweet.

https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andianderson/gender=f/andi_anderson.htm

https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=andieanderson/gender=f/andie-anderson.htm

And I also agree that the idea must have come from an idiot who wanted to exploit the resemblance that she [Andie] has with the other model [Andi]..

It's as always. One site cites the other. If it slips through the radar of the editors it will be mixed up.
The only way to resolve this, is to report it, which is easy on IAFD and Indexxx.

Unfortunately the vendors mix them up also (data 18, adultdvdempire, freeones etc.).
Pornbox is better, they have two different profiles:
https://pornbox.com/application/model/193037
https://pornbox.com/application/model/12292

rk made a mess out of it. They took the old profile of Andi (with her biographical data), took down the original Andi scenes and added the new Andie scenes...
https://www.realitykings.com/model/3595/andie-anderson

That IAFD has already separated both profiles is a victory :ROFLMAO:

Thank you very much! You saved me time [and possibly headaches trying to convince IAFD] :ROFLMAO:

From there it will be easier to separate the profiles of both models on the rest of the bio sites.

Although I think that on many paid [and free] sites; mediocre people who don't want to investigate most likely continue to put the two together.

Now; clearly Reality Kings has ruined it. As they always think that we don't have no memory. So Brazzers [from the same company] has removed entire profiles of models. Now I guess Reality Kings thought that since everyone said that Andie was Andi; they took this chance to delete Andi's videos and have more space on the server or something like that :rolleyes:
 
One site cites the other.
This. A single person makes a single mistake and publishes the error in some way. Other ppl either blindly copy the incorrect information or have a quick look (cos busy/don't really care) and go "Yeah, that's right" and propagate the false data. Later, someone says to themselves "Is that right" and does a quick google or whatever and finds that 3 or 4 usually reliable sites all say the same thing "so it must be true".

Most of the major porn data sites are pretty good about correcting info once someone lets them know and can back it up with something.
 
I was writing the correction for IAFD when I saw that it was already done. I imagine it was you @deezer6 because I don't think they saw my Tweet.

That IAFD has already separated both profiles is a victory :ROFLMAO:

Thank you very much! You saved me time [and possibly headaches trying to convince IAFD] :ROFLMAO:

It wasn't me who split the profiles. I just helped to do the research as we got the info on IAFD that there might be a mix-up. I didn't know Andi nor Andie before that.:)
If I have found your thread earlier, it would have saved me a lot of time.

There wouldn't be much headache to convince IAFD. Unless you are submitting info like: "There is a mix-up in the profile."
Adding evidence (images for both performers, images for different tatts/moles/scars etc.) always help to get a submission done.
Also adding the titles that should be split.
The better the submission, the easier and faster to process it.
Submissions without evidence go to the backburner unless an editor has knowledge of the case.

From there it will be easier to separate the profiles of both models on the rest of the bio sites.

I hope so. I've posted some info on indexxx already, but if you have time it would help to point out to them which links belong to which girl. There are dozens of them...

Although I think that on many paid [and free] sites; mediocre people who don't want to investigate most likely continue to put the two together.

I would say, most of the good databases will be more than happy to split the entries. It might take some time (they are all unpaid volunteers), but they will do it.
Websites that have a serious approach, are IAFD, indexxx, thenude. Also ebi and egafd (but not in this case, as she's not European).:)
boobpedia is a wiki, so you might be able to change things by yourself.
Don't know how to submit to imdb, but they lump them together and also have a third girl (a black female in Women & Attitude) assigned to her...
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2789537/

From what I've seen all the vendor sites lump them together, except of pornbox.
No clue, how to get them to split it up.
I'm not a frequent user of freeones, but you might know if it is possible to split her profile on freeones as they are mixed-up here too. https://www.freeones.com/andi-anderson

Now; clearly Reality Kings has ruined it. As they always think that we don't have no memory. So Brazzers [from the same company] has removed entire profiles of models. Now I guess Reality Kings thought that since everyone said that Andie was Andi; they took this chance to delete Andi's videos and have more space on the server or something like that :rolleyes:

Things like this complicate the work for editors on databases a lot. So they need the input of good (i.e. well documented) submissions.

This. A single person makes a single mistake and publishes the error in some way. Other ppl either blindly copy the incorrect information or have a quick look (cos busy/don't really care) and go "Yeah, that's right" and propagate the false data. Later, someone says to themselves "Is that right" and does a quick google or whatever and finds that 3 or 4 usually reliable sites all say the same thing "so it must be true".

Exactly that's it. And that's where the research need to start, which ramonfreeones here thankfully did.

Most of the major porn data sites are pretty good about correcting info once someone lets them know and can back it up with something.

Yep. The most important part of your sentence is: "back it up".
Show some good evidence! The better documented a submission is, the higher are the changes that it will be handled quick.
 
Top