In a departure from my ongoing series meant to discuss social expectations, conduct and morality I'm going to take a bit of a departure with the sixth installment. This time I'm not going to pose a hypothetical situation and simply ask a question...
Everyone knows that most people behave differently online than in real life. Apparently anonymity makes people bolder, as repercussions are further away and less severe (no one is likely to punch you through these here tubes we call the Intarwebs). So the question is... should this be the case? Do you believe that that people should be held to a lesser standard online? That perhaps people are too timid in real life? Is this simple catharsis at work, or is the more forward and often more aggressive and/or callous behavior seen online unwarranted and uncalled for? How do your actions and responses differ here from how You Might respond in the real world?
What do you think? What do you think...?
Everyone knows that most people behave differently online than in real life. Apparently anonymity makes people bolder, as repercussions are further away and less severe (no one is likely to punch you through these here tubes we call the Intarwebs). So the question is... should this be the case? Do you believe that that people should be held to a lesser standard online? That perhaps people are too timid in real life? Is this simple catharsis at work, or is the more forward and often more aggressive and/or callous behavior seen online unwarranted and uncalled for? How do your actions and responses differ here from how You Might respond in the real world?
What do you think? What do you think...?