American wins Tour de France 2006

PARIS (AP) - Floyd Landis won the Tour de France on Sunday, keeping cycling's most prestigious title in American hands for the eighth straight year.

Yea. Go team go!
http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/5805080

I have this awfull feeling that outside the US, winning means sneaky, backhanded, doping and no matter how many times you get tested, because an American won again, he's a druggy. Fuck. Someone has to win.
 

member006

Closed Account
:thumbsup: :glugglug:

Now, lets hope he doesn't get full of himself like some have in the past. A over abundance of politics in anything spoils it.
 
Well it wouldn't be first time.
 
Watched most of the Tour (have done since the early 90s) :eek: . Never thought Landis was in with a shout after he lost over 8 minutes on the 2nd Alp stage. Up to that point, couldn't care less about him, he rode a boring race, always on someone's wheel, never leading himself. But when he rode almost alone for 150km, leading the whole way on the last Alpine stage, man that was one heck of a ride :bowdown: . Still might have lost the jersey, he (and other top teams) let Pereiro back into the race by giving him 29 min back for free :confused: .
 
Well I've been watching the Tour De France since the mid eighties. This has been one of the most open I've most likely seen. With a few of the top names been taken out before the start of the race due to drugs. This left it wide open and also this proved to be the case. The 36 second gap back to second is one of the smallest ever. The gap of 1 mintue 29 seconds to third is the smallest ever. But the question still is, would have been if such as Basso was still in the race and not been removed ?
 
Maybe, there's no telling. We know Ullrich would have imploded in the Alps (as he usually does), but Basso was a real threat.

Landis, though, was due for a podium or win even with Basso. Landis won the Tours of Georgia and California earlier this year... If Basso was around though, I imagine Landis wouldn't have been able to overcome that 8 minute deficit ...

Fun race to watch either way.:2 cents:
 
Seen the race. The most spectacular Tour I never seen. Landis deserved his victory, the way in came back in Morzine, just the day after he seemed to have lost every chance to win in La Toussuire was just stunning, amazing.
:bowdown:

The Armstrong-Era was boring 'cause we knew forom the very beginning who would win. This Tour was exciting 'cause the race was open you never knew what could happen.

poggy1 said:
Well I've been watching the Tour De France since the mid eighties. This has been one of the most open I've most likely seen. With a few of the top names been taken out before the start of the race due to drugs. This left it wide open and also this proved to be the case. The 36 second gap back to second is one of the smallest ever. The gap of 1 mintue 29 seconds to third is the smallest ever. But the question still is, would have been if such as Basso was still in the race and not been removed ?

No, with Basso and Ullrich the race would never have been that spectacular. The race was open 'cause some teams had lost their leader so the #2 leaders became #1.

Basso is strong and he has strong fellows such as Julich, Sastre...
Sastre is weaker and he had no strong fellows.

The T-Mobile stuff is different : Kloden is nearly as strong as Ullrich. And he had good fellows such as Kessler, Guerini, Rogers... But this team always had terrible stategies. And this year was not different.
For example, in the Pla be Beret stage, the T-Mobile starts running very fast altogether, in order to get the other riders tired and ejects the weakest ones. They all get tired quite fast and when the leader's battle started, Kloden hadno fellows with him to give a help so couldn't follow Landis, Leipheimer and Menchov...
If T-Mobile would have run with their brain, Kloden may won
 
Landis will probably be eliminated : he's been controled postive on the Morzine stage :wtf:
 
Pereiro himself declared he would prefer to keep his 2nd place...

Maybe the organisers will choose to simply not having a winner
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Because when Indurain was winning it wasn't boring? I never liked Indurain and I personnaly prefered Lance Armstrong because he was mentally extremely strong, ruthless and unforgiving. Lance was and is the symbol of courage, absolute winning by dominating the competition and he is also the proof that after having lived with terrible sufferings, you can have hope and achieve some things.
 
Top