Amanda Torres / LoveMyB00obs

Solo models have usually a much more loyal following than hardcore models. That's why there's still a big interest in models like Nadine Jansen or Milena Velba. If they had gone the hardcore route, they would have retired long time ago. It's certainly true that a former solo model's hardcore debut usually meets a peak of new interest, and for a while the model will get more offers. But after a couple of months the demand will decline, and she will have lost many of her original fans.

There are of course exceptions - models who can do both. Maria Moore and Katerina Hartlova f. ex. But those are exceptions because they have quite a variety of original features, and i don't mean just their physical assets here. Most hardcore models however disappear after 1 or 2 years, unless they are escorts and use their releases as advertising. I'm convinced that Amanda, if she did hardcore, wouldn't last long.

you bring up a good point and i can see how amanda's career could possibly end sooner if she went the hardcore route. i'm thinking of when angela white went hc last year for a few shoots - someone who up to that point had only done solo or g/g and now it appears as if she's back to solo shoots (although i haven't really been able to keep track of any recent sets). maybe it might be something amanda does in a few years. it seems like a trick to sort of generate new interest in a model once people get tired of the same old. i guess we will see
 
https://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Amanda_Torres
https://www.lanasbigboobs.com/models/a/amanda_torres/
https://www.busty-legends.com/model/1034/amanda-torres.html
63892548_031_67d3[1].jpg
 
Top