Afghan Civilians ****** by troops?

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Premium Link Upgrade
I **** to seem like a Bush era democrat by posting this. I realize civilians do die in wars but............
Ok the article has me a bit confused.
they use the words "****** by foreign troops".
does the mean USA troops or what?
If so, why not just say it? (oh yeah, their boys in office, gotta hide the facts a little).
they use the words "schoolchildren".
Does that mean they bombed or shot up a school?
Obama didnt mention bombing schools in his speech did he?

A NATO official said initial reports from troops involved in the fighting on Sunday indicated that the victims were insurgents — all young males.
Does that mean someones full of ****? covering their asses with lies?


The latest figures released by the United Nations show that 2,021 civilian died during clashes in the first 10 months of this year, up from 1,838 for the same period last year. Taliban insurgents were blamed for 68 percent of the deaths this year — three times more than NATO ******, according to the U.N.

68% by the taliban? great, so were only ******* 32% of the civilians, far out, thats just awesome.
and how the F is 68% three times more?
even though who really knows how many civilians get ******, its a b.s. statistic.

seems like if we keep it up over there that the taliban wont need to do anything, the civilians of afghanistan will start shooting at us.
 

Premium Content

This thread contains exclusive content for our premium community members.

What you're missing:
  • Full discussion and replies
  • Community interaction and voting
Already have an account?
✨ Unlock exclusive discussions and premium features
Premium Benefits:
Exclusive content • Priority support • Advanced features • Full thread access
Top