Search results

She mentioned having cancer during a cam and kept people updated on it until saying she was cancer free. If you watch cams during that time, you may see bandages on her chest. There were also less outdoor sets and I don't believe she traveled to FL to shoot at all last year.

For someone who has been active weekly since 2008, it's a bit worrisome that she's disappeared all of a sudden. Like this has never happened before. Missed cams? Yes. But outright nothing for multiple weeks? Never. Like there was never even a hiccup in two sets and a video a week, until she was...

I **** to to tell you this but she died in March of 2018. It was asthma related.

Just to follow up on this, she's missed a single week of updates in over a decade. I've also seen another comment implying she makes excuses not to do cams. Even if one is moved back a day, they still happen. There have been only six weeks without a cam in seven months. Two of those weeks she...

Already happened.

Your post reads like you are Phad using an alt account to defend himself. Especially with the "you think you can do better?" like message to xhughx. It doesn't help that your posts in Brooke and Bailey's threads come off the same defensive way.

I'm going to provide some context for others since you apparently skipped everything she talked about. She was camping out west for the eclipse with friends. She showed off masks they wore because it was so dusty and it still didn't help with her allergies. After camping they expected to stay...

It's likely not worth the effort. This stuff only really appeals to people who have been long time fans. As time goes on(she quit 6 years ago), fewer and fewer even care. The teasing sucked while she was active, but you could always hope she'd change her mind. Nobody wants to be teased anymore...

We are getting what I and what everyone else should have expected. They are accidental slips from a tease model who was very very careful to never show anything. Of the slips, most are pussy slips, because she was not always aware of what was showing or to what extent something was see thru...

She's still beautiful.

Re: Ultimate collection: Pink button up She was wearing double sided tape. They talked about it in the video that accompanies this set. :)

She's done some sets in see thru panties She did a cam last week and bent over. Got a real good view of her ballon knot. :D Followed that up with this set. It's the best in a long time. Better than the candid stuff, which is hit or miss, but mostly miss. :(

New people took over and redesigned the site. There was also an update today.

It's a faker.

Yes, they are both on there. There have been sets released with some slips. She's no longer modeling, so don't expect anything more than that.

In one earlier set I know she had see thru panties. It's here: http://www.hottystop.com/meet-madden-sundress/ She did a couple oil/water videos where you could see through the panties too.

http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/kari-sweets-sexy-bikini-shower/

http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/kari-sweets-sailor-girl/

Verunka: http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/watch-4-beauty-verunka-innocence/

You do know that isn't Kari in any of the good photos, right?

I guess there was no new set on Friday?

http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/kari-sweets-hearts-panties/

This set: http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/kari-sweets/kari-sweets-having-some-fun/ and another candid one were released.

I like the studio sets, but the selfies and candid sets aren't that bad.

Oh great, another person taking issue with me calling it her site. As I already said. I refer to it as her site because every photo and video is related to her. When a site is dedicated to an individual model, I refer to is as their website. I don't care whether they are still involved(Meet...

The site is related to Kari Sweets, so I refer to is as her site. This thread is related to Kari Sweets, so I refer to it as her thread. Her involvement doesn't matter.

Scroll up the chatbox on her site.

The new set is pretty good, if you like bush. Not nude or anything, but really nice closeups, and looks like she's wet. Plus a spread cheek shot. The video is a cam, that I haven't seen before. I think it was a private cam(non-nude) anyway. Quality is like previous cams, but she spreads her legs...

Set update and a video yesterday. But the video(cam) looks like a bad upload.

It's really good... I missed those two pictures the first time go around. Thought the ones you mentioned missing, would be at the end. :)

Except the set's name is real and so are the photos.

I waited too long to edit: 'No where' should be 'Nowhere'

No where in my comment did I say it was going to escalate to full nudity, or spread legs. That's why I said if we get anything it will be just like the stuff in the new set. I thought that was pretty obvious with my "like that" statement.

The best part about that 'new' set is, you wouldn't think the original set even had photos like that. Just think about how many sets have had **** like that removed... :) @yoyoyo1 That is from a webcam she did with a friend in July of 2009.

Yeah, it was very nice.

It's still activity. Which is what I thought you were going for, but I guess not. So, I'll return to your original comment. You could have used 4 or possibly 5 years to make your point, but to say she hadn't done anything in 8, 9, or more years is silly. That was before her site went off the...

She was doing cams up until two years ago.

It's called Down In Mexico. There was no set to go along with it. There were only a few of the bedroom videos that had a companion photo set. It was a set that was black and white. If you visit her main page, you'll see this one up there.

She retired a long time ago.

You know damn well that isn't his name.

Ask a mod or an admin that question. I just realized how many total posts I've lost with that thread being deleting.

It's nice to know I'm not the only one who notices a lot of bots/fake posters. :)

WOW, you just don't get it. The blog post only said this: No where in that one line, did it say anything about her being ******* into releasing anything. There's also no mention of her doing it "in exchange for", or a webmaster having some "bargaining chip". So, a sex tape, if you believe...

You are forgetting that you are the one who started the "initial rumor" in the first place, barlee. If anyone would know what supports or doesn't support that rumor, it'd be you. But your rumor isn't based on any knowledge. It's just something you made up.

It's shopped from her Pachanga Pigtails set.

You can't tell that a lot of "link" posters on freeones, are just people shilling for a particular site? They don't care if something is a repost or not. They likely aren't even fans of any of the models.

Not really. I think there is going to be an incoming **** storm.

She reviewed everything before it got uploaded.

Whoever that is, has been pasting that everywhere for a long time. Obviously not a fan though. When site ownership is in doubt, you always check the ccbill page. It's the same as it's always been. The site or blog that caused people to get excited is just like a lot of others. It's just...

Where you live in relation to another person is a moot point. It's weird that people believe invading a model's privacy online, isn't nearly the same as doing it physically. There are probably a few who do it online, but they don't go around talking about it, because they know they'd get ****...