Anyone who says lets change *** laws or ban certain guns, clearly has no idea what they are talking about.
lol if we ban or change *** law's what do you think would happen? Ill tell you it will get worse, just look at all the ******* substances meth, heroin, ********* and etc all these are ******* but yet they are being flooded onto the streets of every neighborhood in america.
We cant change what comes into this country or what happens to people but have the right to defend it with are right to bear arms, you take these guns away from the people that abide by the law and use them to protect their ****** and friends and yet the crimanals will still have access to these sort of weapons.
Guns dont **** people, man does. For example if that guy in CT was to have a ***** and slit the throats of all those ****, think about how many more he would have ****** being silent and taking people out without a single peep. And nobody would have known what was going on.
Sayings guns **** people is like saying spoons made me fat.
Pure sophistry.
First of all, who here said anything about banning guns? That would be impossible, and everyone knows it, even the staunchest advocates of ***
control. You're right that banning something creates a black market for it. It's why there's a black market for ******* *****, and why there was bootlegging during Prohibition.
But here's the thing: if we care enough about something, we don't let that stop us. We don't allow minors to buy ******* or cigarettes, so why do we let just anyone buy guns? Hell, in some cases we go even farther. We actually do ban ***** pornography despite the fact that there will always be pedophiles who want it. It's called doing something instead of giving up.
Second, "change *** laws"? What *** laws? We don't have any, and even those we do have are toothless and easily circumvented.
Third, most people don't think guns are to blame. Almost everyone thinks it's the people who use them irresponsibly.
And yes, if somebody wants to **** someone, they'll find a way. They'll use a *****, or run them over with their car, or bludgeon them with a hammer, or maybe just use their bare hands or poison them. But what really pisses me off about the unbridled availability of guns is the number of people we never get to punish because they take the coward's way out, like the KC player who ****** his wife a couple weeks ago. Had he not had a ***, he still could have ****** her, but he would have been a lot less likely to **** himself without a ***. In taking his own life, he deprived us of being able to put his ass in jail for the rest of his life, or even putting him to death if that's the law.
It should be at least as hard to get an assault rifle as it is to get a driver's license.
Finally, I just have to take issue with this little nugget:
if that guy in CT was to have a ***** and slit the throats of all those ****, think about how many more he would have ****** being silent and taking people out without a single peep. And nobody would have known what was going on.
What the eff are you talking about? You really think people wouldn't have noticed somebody walking around slitting people's throats? It's a public place with a lot of people, I think someone would have noticed.
I will now graciously refrain from making any more comments in this thread (at least for a while) as I've more than said my share here today.