Rachel Aldana

[THOWIG]

1.Music on the videos is very annoying as they sound like some cheap day time tv theme tune.
2.The structure of the videos are always the same. Camera just floats around a bit and Rachel takes her top off. End. Not very alluring. Don't want her to be explicit cause that's not her thing and that's cool.
3. Photo sets are really boring.
4. Basically once you've seen one picture of her that's all you need to see. Don't need to subscribe to the site to see anymore.

 

[theelectricdude]

I agree with the guy above I would not pay 20 bucks a month for the same shots and for someone that only takes here top off. You should work for someone else besides pinup glam and spice it up. Also whats up with the lines under your breast? Dose anyone else see this? I'd say there fake!

 

[DieselXXX]

I agree with the guy above I would not pay 20 bucks a month for the same shots and for someone that only takes here top off. You should work for someone else besides pinup glam and spice it up. Also whats up with the lines under your breast? Dose anyone else see this? I'd say there fake!

Nice first post. you're going to fit in just fine !. Two things. 1. If you're not a fan then why post ? 2. Fuck off !

 

[DieselXXX]

You can say what you want. That's your right. It's just no one wants to hear it. Obviously this thread is for fans of Rachel. therefore why does anyone want to hear you complaining about her. I may well be flying solo with this view. There are plenty of Girls with threads about them on here that I don't care for much, heres what I do.....I don't post on them.

 

[princedf]

mute the audio and have different playback.
purple snaps #2 play '3' britney spears..match the unbutton to britney counting..
cant get any better..

 

[pinupglam01]

That is a hilariously awesome suggestion...

Rachel is back with a new WebCam today:

Premium Link Upgrade

Premium Link Upgrade

 

[pinupglam01]

Also whats up with the lines under your breast? Dose anyone else see this? I'd say there fake!

First of all it's "they're" not "there". "They're" is a contraction of the two words "They are" and "there" is a noun used to describe the location of something, i.e. "it's over there".

Secondly, breast tissue is like most fatty tissue, i.e. it's not all smooth and perfectly round, especially for women with considerably larger breasts. All you have to do is look at women with macromastia to see this. It's also why many women have one boob slightly larger than the other (Rachel does not have this, but many women do). Plus there are other tissues and ligaments that suspend the breast tissue and those aren't always even and symmetrical either. The line you are looking at is one of those ligaments:

Premium Link Upgrade

 

[pinupglam01]

And this comes from a man that talks about blowing loads on a hairy bush. If you cant say what you want on here than whats it for.:fight:

You're actually not allowed to simply say whatever you want in here. That's why they have the forum rules, which you should re-read:

Premium Link Upgrade

If you want freedom of speech, go start your own forum.

 

[thisrocks]

This guy theelectricdude has got a good point from all accept. For one thing if you read the flaming rules he doesn't even break any of the rules. Pinup glam is just mad about him saying that her breast are fake. I don't ever remember seeing lines in fat tissue before, how convenient it be directly under her breast.She dose have implants and should stop saying other wise. Just like saying she has the biggest breast in England. Premium Link Upgrade

 

[thisrocks]

Premium Link Upgrade

 

[wistasse]

oo she is just too CUTE! YUM

That is a hilariously awesome suggestion...

Rachel is back with a new WebCam today:

Premium Link Upgrade

Premium Link Upgrade

 

[coachrgb]

To whomever it is above who can't spell for ****:

If you don't like the model, why waste your time? While I appreciate your service overseas, and I do, why bother stirring up ****? I've read many posts on here and the vast majority of posters are obviously fans of Rachel. I don't know about "writes" as you say and who grants them to you, but like you, I am an American and we do have certain inalienable RIGHTS, but this is an internet forum which serves people around the world, not just in the US and the people who work on this forum are surely entitled, as it is their RIGHT to have their posters abide by certain rules or be ****** as they see fit, whether you nobly served our country in Iraq or not. If you are of age and have ****** all the required tests, you have the right to drive a car. However, you do NOT have the right to do it ***** or at 140 mph. Those are the rules. Likewise, they post rules for forum use accordingly. I have absolutely NOTHING to do with this site and I have no control, I'm just an observer. If you don't like Rachel or her site, don't come here and don't join the site. THAT is your right. Surely you've got better things to do. Find a model you DO like and maybe say something nice.

For the record, Rachel, I think you're lovely. NO model, NONE, are going to please EVERYONE. You are obviously beautiful and most every guy with an active brain, fairly decent eyesight and warm heterosexual ***** will find you very hot. Some people have weird taste though. Don't worry about that. There isn't a model in the entire world that every single human being likes. There will always be detractors. Likewise, there are some models out there I think are just hideous and obviously they have legions of fans so everyone has different tastes. Pose any way you wish and however you feel comfortable and I assure you, most people will be satisfied. Some will never be satisfied, that is just a fact of life. Personally, would I object if you dropped your drawers? Hell no. However, I also won't complain if you don't.

 

[pinupglam01]

Agreed 100% Thanks for posting what I was thinking.

 

[THOWIG]

What I said wasn't aimed at Rachel. Who looks and seems lovely.
My problem was aimed at her website and who ever takes the photos, designed the site or works on the filming. It's all pretty poor.

 

[RachelAldana]

What I said wasn't aimed at Rachel. Who looks and seems lovely.
My problem was aimed at her website and who ever takes the photos, designed the site or works on the filming. It's all pretty poor.

Well, since I'm the one who supervises and approves it all, those comments are aimed at me. Let me set the record straight for those of you out there who seem to think that we models are all trained seals who simply do the bidding of our webmasters or "handlers".

First off, I am an individual, with my own brain and my own mind and my own opinions. I know what I like and what I am comfortable with and also what I don't like. My website is MY site. I own it in full and all the content on it. I'm not under the control of Pinup or anyone else. They are my webmasters and they run things on my behalf, but I am in the loop on everything and I approve everything before it gets placed on the site.

Furthermore, in the shoots, I know what I am willing to do and not willing to do. Those of you who want to see me bouncing on trampolines and sucking my own nipples and putting vacuum cleaners on my boobs and other such nonsense are not going to see that. I don't like that kind of thing, don't think it looks good, don't think it's very lady-like, and I'm not comfortable doing it.

I am not a porn star or exhibitionist and I don't "fake" anything, like many models do. You may not like what I do and how I do it, and that's fine, but making comments like I've got some Svengali-like management team controlling me and restricting what I do is ludicrous and insulting. I am an adult and perfectly capable of making my own decisions and what you see on my site is the direct result of my decisions.

As far as my site design and the quality of the content, I'm not sure what your gripe is exactly, but I would challenge you to find a better designed, more easily navigable solo model site than mine out there. Everything on it is easy to find and search and to mark as favorites. I don't know what else you could want. As for the photos and videos, me and the Pinup crew take great care to make them as nice looking as possible, so again I don't know what you are complaining about.

Finally, please understand the fact that this site is the direct result of my work and input and supervision. I put up webcams every single week that I do myself, so the fact that you think I'm not directly and immediately involved in everything that goes on with my site is rather baffling to me.

 

[THOWIG]

Nice attempt to make a message sound like it's coming from Rachel directly. You must think people on here are pretty dumb.

Firstly I have no interest in seeing her stick a vacuum on her boobs or any other thing she doesn't want to do.She should feel free to do what ever she wants. Also as I said this wasn't an ****** on her.

I would have thought as well that if someone criticised the site, and the work on it, that they would just say sorry don't subscribe, not go on some made up tirade that attacks people.

What do I know about design, photography, film? Oooooh I would love you to see who I am, but that's the beauty of the Internet.

Don't ****** people that subscribe to your sites. People pay up to 30 dollars a month to look at your sites so Im sure you're not doing badly.

Respect opinions.

 

[RachelAldana]

Well, if you don't believe this is me, then I don't know what to say. I simply want those of you out there to understand that my site is the product of my work and wishes, not someone else's.

You want me to respect your opinion? How about you respect mine.

 

[raven_azrael]

Well it's not you so we can move on that one.

The site might be the product of her wishes I'm really not bothered. People who make these sites need to listen to the people who pay for them. Read my posts to hear what I've said because you're actually talking about things that I've not even said.
.

I do consider that models ad webmasters should listen to fans. But they can not please everybody, so cant we.

If anybody has a complain, it should be expressed in a way that doesnt sound agressive. We are in a friendly community so we have to stick to that friendly. Remember what happened to Faith from inbedwithfaith. she was virtually attacked by fans and she left the forum. :wave:

 

[coachrgb]

Hey--correct me if I am wrong but I believe I was SUPPORTING Rachel. Not trying to stir up controversy? Unless I was really ***** when I wrote the original post or really ***** now (neither of which is true---but it's only 10 PM on Friday, could be ***** in a few hours), I think I said nice things about Rachel. . . . .and I don't even know her. :thefinger And for the record, THOWIG, it wasn't your posts I was talking about but rather some other person whose posts apparently have been deleted.

 

[pinupglam01]

First off, that is Rachel posting. Given that Rachel has posted here in this thread multiple times in the past, I don't know why THOWIG thinks it isn't, but he's convinced himself, so whatever.

Secondly, it would have been nice if he had offered something along the lines of constructive criticism, not just things he doesn't like. Offering up a solution or a suggestion of what he would like to see instead is usually the way to go with that, instead of just saying something is "boring" which is really not much help.

Thirdly, there he expressly said "what I said wasn't aimed at Rachel. Who looks and seems lovely. My problem was aimed at her website and who ever takes the photos, designed the site or works on the filming. It's all pretty poor." which indicates that he thinks (inexplicably) that Rachel is somehow not involved in her own website. She owns the site, owns the domain, owns all the copyrights to everything on it and has been there for every single shoot that has ever been done for the site, and she has full approval of all content before it goes online, so why he would think otherwise is a bit mystifying.

All of the rest of you seem to generally be in Rachel's corner and supportive of her and that's appreciated. We are also completely open to and welcome suggestions and constructive criticism, but comments like "Photo sets are really boring" that don't elaborate any further are no help at all.