You know how stupid that comment sounds?? That's like saying blacks are labeled "nigg**s" cause that's what they are.The scenes are called interracial because that's what they are.
You know how stupid that comment sounds?? That's like saying blacks are labeled "nigg**s" cause that's what they are.The scenes are called interracial because that's what they are.
Value judgement, you just made one.You know how stupid that comment sounds?? That's like saying blacks are labeled "nigg**s" cause that's what they are.
Don't misunderstand me... I'm not trying to say that the term "interracial" is as equally offensive as the term "******". I'm fully aware of the point he was "trying" to make. I was simply using an analogical example to make my point. "Interracial" is a term used to described something that is not. So to say it is because it is, is just ignorance. It's like saying a ****** is a ******, simply because it is what it is. The point is that neither word should be used to describe either thing.Value judgement, you just made one.
You've valuated "interracial" as offensive as "******," which means someone else can now do the same.
And that's how it starts, from misunderstanding to labeling, instead of stopping to understand someone's point.
Be that as it may... the truth is that it does exist in full *****, despite the many people that deny its existence in the industry to begin with.Racism in Porn is just a political argument that far too many people like to leverage over others to feel better about themselves.
You know how stupid that comment sounds?? That's like saying blacks are labeled "nigg**s" cause that's what they are.
How so? Please explain.You do realize that what you just said makes you a hypocrite, don't you?![]()
How so? Please explain.
You know how stupid that comment sounds?? That's like saying blacks are labeled "nigg**s" cause that's what they are.
And what term do YOU use to describe black Americans?? There is no negative connotation associated with using the term black. I think most people would agree that it's an accepted ethnicity that you can find on most surveys, applications, etc. You'd have a hard time trying to claim it as negative or "racial labeling".You said this...
...in response to me saying that porn scenes are called interracial because that's what they are. But, didn't you just use the term BLACKS? :dunno: If you don't like labels, then don't use them yourself.
Dude, the term "interracial" is a racist label by itself. This is what you still fail to get, but I'll explain it again below.I am white, you are black. There is nothing wrong with saying that. They are descriptive labels, not racist ones.
There's a difference in the connotation and vulgarity of the words... but that's not the issue here. You basically stated that interracial is interracial, because that's what it is... and it is what it is. But what you failed to realize is that the term "interracial" is very much a label (and it IS a racist/derogatory one) just as the term "******" is very much a label. Yes, I know that they are not equal in vulgarity, but again... that's not the issue. You wouldn't call a ***** interracial without it being taken negatively. The fact that you can't realize that the term interracial is as much of a label as ****** is, tells a lot. That's the point I'm trying to make. If you could see past the own labels that you spout out, You Might be able to realize that some of your "labels" do have derogatory and/or racial connotations behind them. And by continuing to justify the use of these labels through ignorance, by saying things like "interracial... it is what it is... etc.", you're only contributing to the problem.FYI - I personally believe there's a huge difference between calling a porn scene interracial and calling a black person a ******. Huuuuuge difference.
Fox,You do make some good and admirable points.However the claim that race is just a myth determined only by skin color of the Nordic,African,Asian members of the same ONE race seems innacurate to Me.Different Peoples have other racial features other than just skin color.Bone structure and facial features are quite different among African/Asian/European etc.people.-Eye shape and color,nose shape,hair texture differences,etc.etc.--This honestly cannot be explained by whose ancesters lived in a warmer or colder climate.The differences in people are more than just skin color as any archeologist or forensic scientist will confirm.-No big deal,Fox-Just that Your theory that race is determined only by the sun exposure of our ancestors seems quite incorrect to Me,considering all the other differences in bone structure and other appearance.--But:-I do consider US ALL the Human Race.That's good enough for Me.I wouldn't want everyone to look the same.What a boring world it would be.-Peace,SammyBecause as I'm always saying, race is nonexistent. We all come from one small race of dark skinned Africans. Those of us who have lighter skin have that because our more recent ancestors inhabited colder parts of the planet. Today there are all kinds of relationships between people with different genes and skin colours. So there really isn't any "white" and "black" anymore. And even though, based on appearance, you can describe someone as white or black, or really doesn't mean anything.
To racist whites (some of them don't know they're racist), if you have 10% "black ancestry" then you're black. It's called the one drop theory and it's meant to subliminally suggest racial impurity and therefore that someone is an outsider or worse, of lesser value because they are not pure white. To racist blacks (some of them don't know they're racist), if you have 10% "white ancestry" then you're white. Or not "really black". Even though white society has glorified "less dark" blacks in celebritydom especially in Latin America, the truth is... it's just one whole bunch of racist bullshit.
"Interracial" is both incorrect and offensive... because (a) it implies that you are either one or the other, and that the two don't mix, and if they do, it needs it's own special, unusual, and ***** term. (b) it is very offensive to people who have parents of different skin colours, because it implies that there are two separate races that have mixed together to make them, and that they are somehow unique or abnormal BECAUSE of this, when in fact their genetic make up is as normal and everyday and typical as everyone else's. And (c) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RACE, black and white are colours, can be used to describe skin, but while "skin colour" exists, "black race" and "white race" do not, because as I keep saying - we come from ONE SMALL GROUP of people, and our skin colour is determined not by "which race" we hail from, cause there IS ONLY ONE RACE, the human race... but by which climate our more recent ancestors happened to live in for a long period of time.
Is it just racist in regards to pr0n, or what about its use in mainstream tv and movies?Dude, the term "interracial" is a racist label by itself. This is what you still fail to get, but I'll explain it again below.
There's a difference in the connotation and vulgarity of the words... but that's not the issue here. You basically stated that interracial is interracial, because that's what it is... and it is what it is. But what you failed to realize is that the term "interracial" is very much a label (and it IS a racist/derogatory one) just as the term "******" is very much a label. Yes, I know that they are not equal in vulgarity, but again... that's not the issue. You wouldn't call a ***** interracial without it being taken negatively. The fact that you can't realize that the term interracial is as much of a label as ****** is, tells a lot. That's the point I'm trying to make. If you could see past the own labels that you spout out, you might be able to realize that some of your "labels" do have derogatory and/or racial connotations behind them. And by continuing to justify the use of these labels through ignorance, by saying things like "interracial... it is what it is... etc.", you're only contributing to the problem.
I don't think it matters under what medium you use such terms. They all have racial/negative connotations to them.Is it just racist in regards to pr0n, or what about its use in mainstream tv and movies?
It's not "all" due to sun exposure. Case in point... When you live in places where it can be very bright and windy (like the north pole, parts of Asia), the eyes adapt over time to become a trait we identify as being associated with most Eskimos and Asians today.Different Peoples have other racial features other than just skin color.Bone structure and facial features are quite different among African/Asian/European etc.people.-Eye shape and color,nose shape,hair texture differences,etc.etc.--This honestly cannot be explained by whose ancesters lived in a warmer or colder climate.The differences in people are more than just skin color as any archeologist or forensic scientist will confirm.-No big deal,Fox-Just that Your theory that race is determined only by the sun exposure of our ancestors seems quite incorrect to Me,considering all the other differences in bone structure and other appearance.--
Dude, the term "interracial" is a racist label by itself. This is what you still fail to get, but I'll explain it again below.